· for engineering leaders ·

Standardize Claude Code
before it standardizes you.

50+ developers using AI their own way is a governance problem. Drills is the playbook that fixes it.

Schedule an onboarding call →
30-min call · no-pressure scoping · volume pricing on request

Claude Code arrived before you approved it.

You didn’t approve Claude Code — it arrived anyway, developer by developer, team by team. Now you have an org-wide AI dependency with no documented usage patterns, no consistency standards, and no audit trail for what your engineers are actually prompting. When your security team asks how Claude Code is being used across the codebase, you don’t have a clean answer. That gap is a risk, and it’s growing.

Documented. Reproducible. Defensible.

01

25 standardized Claude Code techniques your organization can adopt as official usage policy — documented, reproducible, defensible.

02

Skills designed for institutional use: each one is scoped to a single, auditable outcome so usage is traceable and reviewable.

03

Private repo delivery means your security team controls access — no public dependency, no third-party SaaS risk surface, no vendor lock-in.

Used by engineering leaders who needed Claude Code usage documented before their next compliance review.

"What’s our compliance exposure?"

// the honest answer

Compliance exposure on AI tooling is the question your legal team is going to ask before your next audit. The answer "developers are using best judgment" is not an answer. Drills gives you a documented, standardized set of approved techniques your team uses by policy, not by intuition. The delivery is a private GitHub repo your IT team controls — there is no data shared with a third-party SaaS, no user accounts, no telemetry. Your security posture doesn’t change. Your documentation posture does.

Schedule an onboarding call →
or see /teams for seat-based quotes